Your Current Position:  Home Page >> International Exchanges and Cooperation >> Text
 
     
 
Phase Two business area for people who returned from overseas study to seek development.1352 visiting scholars and personnel for advanced study. According to the statistics, since the reform of the selecting and managing method on candidates going to study abroad at public expense, there had been 10180 scholars sending abroad by the end of 1999. By June 30, 2000, there were 7500 individuals sending to study abroad funded by the National Study Abroad Foundation.
       When they sent young people abroad for advanced studies, the state and organizations hoped they would come back to serve their country. But after the mid-1980s, a considerable number of those studying abroad failed to come back as scheduled. Encouraging Chinese students to come back after completing their studies abroad, therefore, is an important part of work concerning the study-abroad program. In 1985, when the first batch of Chinese students sent abroad after China began implementing reform and open policies had won their doctor's degrees, a number of mobile post-
 

doctorate stations were established in China to attract them back. In the early 1990s, the government adopted policies which can be summarized as follows: that the government supports Chinese students to study abroad; that students are encouraged to return after completing their studies; and that students are free to come back and leave the country of their own free will. The government established a Study-Abroad Fund to support scientific researches undertaken by returned students as well as provided preferential conditions for returned students to start businesses. Localities throughout the country came up with a host of preferential policies to attract returned students. In 1996, in the selection of government-financed study-abroad candidates, the old method of quota allocation was replaced by a new method consisting of the following: "application by individuals, examination and evaluation by experts, fair competition, selection of the best, assignment to a study-abroad stint after the signing of a contract, and compensation payment in case of contract violations." With the new method, which is open and fair, better qualified students were selected for government-financed studies abroad. Since the method was applied, more than 90 percent of government-financed students have returned as scheduled after completing their studies. A few failing to come back have

 
Back
Home
Next